Lefebure v. Boeker, et al
| Priscilla Lefebure |
| Barrett Boeker, Samuel D D'aquila, J Austin Daniel, Does 6-20, Insurance Company Does 1-5 and West Feliciana Parish |
| 3:2017cv01791 |
| December 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| John W. deGravelles |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
RULING AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Barrett Boeker's 51 Rule 12(b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss. Defendant Barrett Boeker's Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(e) is DENIED. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave of court to amend her Complaint a second and final time on or before 7/25/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 6/26/2019. (SWE)
|
|
Filing
82
RULING AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the 57 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant, Samuel C. DAquilla, District Attorney for the 20th Judicial District, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth above. Plaintiff's reque st for leave of court to amend her Complaint is GRANTED, a second and final time, and shall be submitted within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is also ordered to file a Rule 7(a) Response to the DA's assertion of the defense of qualified immunity as to the remaining individual capacity claims within this same deadline. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 6/25/2019. (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
