Nelson v. Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections et al
| Donald Nelson |
| ABC Insurance Companies, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections and XYZ Insurance Companies |
| 3:2018cv00282 |
| March 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
RULING granting 56 Motion to Dismiss as Moot and Failure to State a Claim and the claims against Secretary LeBlanc are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 12/15/2020. (SWE)
|
|
Filing
40
RULING granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The claims against him are Dismissed without Prejudice. Plaintiff, Donald Nelson, shall file a Second Amended Complaint, if any, within 30 days of this Court's Ruling. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 9/12/2019. (EDC)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting 27 Motion to Stay Discovery. ORDERED that discovery in this matter is STAYED pending resolution of the issues raised in the Motion to Dismiss. A scheduling conference will be reset, if necessary, following resolution of the Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 05/09/2019. (ELW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
