Dubroc v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al
Plaintiff: Sarah Dubroc
Defendant: Medical Engineering Corporation and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Case Number: 3:2018cv00833
Filed: September 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Richard L Bourgeois
Referring Judge: Shelly D Dick
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2018 Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Medical Engineering Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Surprenant, Diana) Modified on 11/9/2018 to edit text (SGO).
October 17, 2018 Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Medical Engineering Corporation, filed by Sarah Dubroc.(Schexnaydre, David) Modified on 10/18/2018 to edit the text (SWE).
October 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1653, on or before 10/19/2018, the plaintiff shall file an amended complaint providing the citizenship of plaintiff and defendant by setting forth all citizenship particulars required to sustain federal diversity jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 10/05/2018. (NLT)
October 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 12/6/2018 at 02:00 PM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr. Status Report due by 11/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 10/5/2018. (JSL)
October 4, 2018 Reset Deadlines: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. answer due 11/12/2018; Medical Engineering Corporation answer due 11/12/2018. (SWE)
October 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings. Defendants, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and MedicalEngineering Corp., shall file responsive pleadings on or before November 12, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 10/4/2018. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (JSL)
October 3, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time Responsive Pleadings by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Medical Engineering Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading;)(Surprenant, Diana)
October 3, 2018 MOTION(S) REFERRED: #10 MOTION for Extension of Time Responsive Pleadings. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (EDC)
September 22, 2018 Filing 9 Affidavit of Service of Process by Sarah Dubroc. Medical Engineering Corporation served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Schexnaydre, David) Modified on 9/24/2018 to edit text (SGO).
September 22, 2018 Filing 8 Affidavit of Service of Process by Sarah Dubroc. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Schexnaydre, David) Modified on 9/24/2018 to edit text (SGO).
September 17, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Medical Engineering Corporation. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SGO)
September 17, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Submitted by Sarah Dubroc. (Schexnaydre, David) Modified on 9/17/2018 to edit text (SGO).
September 17, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Submitted by Sarah Dubroc. (Schexnaydre, David) Modified on 9/17/2018 to edit text (SGO).
September 17, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Not Issued: Counsel has requested issuance of a summons for Bristol-Myers Squibb D/B/A/ Surgitek and Medical Engineering Corporation. The summons list more than one defendant. Therefore, summons will not be issued. (EDC)
September 14, 2018 Filing 3 Summons submitted as to 2 Summons Not Issued by Sarah Dubroc. (Schexnaydre, David) Modified on 9/17/2018 to edit text. (EDC).
September 13, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Not Issued: Counsel has requested issuance of a summons. The summons are incomplete. Therefore, summons will not be issued. (SGO)
September 12, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-1829137.), filed by Sarah Dubroc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Summons)(Schexnaydre, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dubroc v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medical Engineering Corporation
Represented By: E. Paige Sensenbrenner
Represented By: Diana Cole Surprenant
Represented By: Grant Joseph Guillot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Represented By: E. Paige Sensenbrenner
Represented By: Diana Cole Surprenant
Represented By: Grant Joseph Guillot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Dubroc
Represented By: David J. Schexnaydre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?