Rotolo Consultants, Inc. v. Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc.
| Rotolo Consultants, Inc. |
| Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv00992 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| John W deGravelles |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rotolo Consultants, Inc.. Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc. served on 12/10/2018, answer due 12/31/2018. (Walker, John) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc.. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
| Filing 10 Summons Submitted (Walker, John) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc.. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
| Filing 8 Summons Submitted (Walker, John) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rotolo Consultants, Inc.. Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc. served on 11/15/2018, answer due 12/6/2018. (Walker, John) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc.. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
| Filing 5 Summons Submitted (Walker, John) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rotolo Consultants, Inc.. (Walker, John) |
Filing 3
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 1/10/2019 at 11:00 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. Status Report due by 12/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 11/6/2018. (EDC)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc.. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-1856430.), filed by Rotolo Consultants, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Walker, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rotolo Consultants, Inc. v. Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carter Brothers Technology Group, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rotolo Consultants, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John R. Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
