Ascension Parish Government v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
Ascension Parish Government |
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc., INSYS Therapeutics, Inc., Allergan PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Morris and Dickson Co., LLC, Cardinal Health, Inc, Actavis, LLC, Allergan Finance LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Noramco, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. |
3:2018cv01088 |
December 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Shelly D Dick |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Return on Electronic Transfer from Ohio Northern. (NLT) |
Filing 18 Extraction Log of a case Transferred to Ohio Northern. (NLT) |
Filing 17 Order Transferring Case to JPML Court. (Attachments: #1 JPML Order)(NLT) |
Filing 16 ORDER lifting the Stay of Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-73) (Attachments: #1 NEF from JPML Court, #2 Minute Order)(NLT) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Consent Motion to Continue Submission of Plaintiffs Motion for Remand for good cause shown. It is hereby further ordered that the submission of Plaintiffs Motion for Remand is continued without date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 1/15/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
Filing 14 Consent MOTION to Continue Submission of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand by McKesson Corporation, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading;)(Williams, Stacey) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #14 Consent MOTION to Continue Submission of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT) |
Filing 13 ORDER: The #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint is GRANTED IN PART. All Manufacturing Defendants shall have up to, through and including 30 days after the later of (1) this Court's ruling on the pending motion remand, or (2) the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation enters a final order granting a motion to vacate the conditional transfer order or a final decision otherwise denying transfer to the MDL to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 1/4/2019. (KAH) |
Filing 12 ORDER: The #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint is GRANTED IN PART. McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and Cardinal Health, Inc. shall have up to, through and including 30 days after the later of (1) this Court's ruling on the pending motion to remand, or (2) the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation enters a final order granting a motion to vacate the conditional transfer order or a final decision otherwise denying transfer to the MDL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 1/4/2019. (KAH) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KAH) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Ascension Parish Government. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Leger, Walter) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KAH) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Crisler, Richard) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Time to File Responsive Pleadings. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (ELW) |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Time to File Responsive Pleadings by AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc, McKesson Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading;)(Williams, Stacey) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Notice of Collateral Proceedings by McKesson Corporation (Williams, Stacey) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by McKesson Corporation (Williams, Stacey) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Supplemental Notice of Removal by McKesson Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Williams, Stacey) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Proceedings by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Crisler, Richard) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Corporate Parent Teva Pharmaceuticals Holdings Cooperative U.A., Corporate Parent Orvet UK Unlimited, Corporate Parent IVAX LLC for Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc... (Crisler, Richard) |
Filing 3 Letter to Attorney Walter J. Leger, Jr. regarding Brigid E. Collins who is Co-Counsel for party Ascension Parish Government. Attorney is not admitted to practice in LAMD. (SWE) |
Filing 2 Letter to JPML Panel notifying panel of possible JPML case (SWE) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 23rd JDC Parish of Ascension, Case Number 123831. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-1877414), filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Attachment Attorney List)(Crisler, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.