Vitter v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Glynda Vitter |
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson |
3:2019cv00230 |
April 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Shelly D Dick |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
11 U.S.C. § 101 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Remand (certified copy mailed to 19th JDC). Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick, Judge Brian A. Jackson and Judge John W. deGravelles on 7/8/2019. (SWE) Modified on 7/8/2019 to edit the docket text (SWE). |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Supplemental Authority in Support of #10 Motion to Remand by Glynda Vitter (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Cheek, Lindsey) Modified on 6/27/2019 to edit the text (KAH). |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to #10 Emergency MOTION to Remand filed by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(SWE) Modified on 6/12/2019 to edit file date (SWE). |
Filing 20 ORDER granting #19 Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit. The clerk is directed to file R. Docs. 19-1 through 19-7 into the record.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 6/11/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #19 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limit in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (SWE) |
Filing 19 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limit in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading; Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit 1 to Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #3 Exhibit 2 to Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #4 Exhibit 3 to Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #5 Exhibit 4 to Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #6 Exhibit 5 to Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #7 Exhibit 6 to Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #8 Proposed Pleading; Proposed Order)(Sossamon, Meera) Modified on 6/11/2019 to edit the text (SWE). |
Filing 18 ORDER finding as moot #14 Motion for Oral Argument on #10 Emergency Motion to Remand. Duplicate filing of #12 Request for Oral Argument which has already been denied (R. doc. 17). Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 5/29/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
Filing 17 ORDER denying #12 Motion for Oral Argument on #10 Emergency Motion to Remand. If the Court determines that oral argument will assist in resolution of the Motion to Remand, the Court will schedule argument. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 5/28/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
Filing 16 ORDER denying without prejudice the #11 MOTION for Leave to File Memo in Support of Emergency Motion to Remand for failure to comply with FRCP 11 and Local Civil Rule 11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 5/28/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Remand and Combined Motion for Leave to File in Excess of the Page Limit. The clerk is directed to strike R. Docs. 10-1, 10-2 and 10-3. The clerk is further ordered to file R. Doc. 13-2 into the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 5/23/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #13 MOTION to Strike an Incorrectly Filed Document . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #14 MOTION for Oral Argument on #10 Emergency MOTION to Remand . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Oral Argument on #10 Emergency MOTION to Remand by Glynda Vitter. (Cheek, Lindsey) Modified on 5/22/2019 to edit his text (NLT). |
Filing 13 MOTION to Strike an Incorrectly Filed Document by Glynda Vitter. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading;, #2 Memorandum in Support)(Cheek, Lindsey) |
Filing 12 REQUEST for Oral Argument on #10 Emergency MOTION to Remand by Glynda Vitter. (KAH) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File Memorandum in Support of #10 Emergency Motion to Remand by Glynda Vitter. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading;)(KAH) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #12 MOTION for Oral Argument on #10 Emergency MOTION to Remand , #11 MOTION for Leave to File Memo in Support of Emergency Motion to Remand, #10 Emergency MOTION to Remand . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KAH) |
Filing 10 Emergency MOTION to Remand by Glynda Vitter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 motion for leave, #3 Request for Oral argument, #4 Proposed Order, #5 Exhibit A, #6 Exhibit B, #7 Exhibit C-1, #8 Exhibit C-2, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Exhibit E)(Cheek, Lindsey) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc..(Benach, Carlos) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Under Local Rule 7(a), Johnson & Johnson and and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. is granted an extension to file responsive pleadings 5/16/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 5/9/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Notice of Removal, by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Benach, Carlos) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Notice of Removal, . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Recent Court Decision from the Southern District of New York by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Recent Decision from SDNY Court)(Benach, Carlos) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Ex Parte MOTION to Substitute Notice of Removal with Correct Caption. The clerk is directed to replace R. Doc. 1 with R. Doc. 4-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 4/23/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #4 Ex Parte MOTION to Substitute Notice of Removal with Correct Caption in place of Rec. Doc. 1 . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (SWE) |
Filing 4 Ex Parte MOTION to Substitute Notice of Removal with Correct Caption in place of Rec. Doc. 1 by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading;, #2 Proposed Order)(Sossamon, Meera) |
Filing 3 Letter to JPML Panel notifying panel of possible JPML case (KAH) |
Filing 2 Letter to Attorney Brian King regarding Bridget B. Truxillo who is Co-Counsel for party Glynda Vitter. Attorney is not admitted to practice in LAMD. (KAH) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 19th Judicial District, Case Number C-681082. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-1929889), filed by Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B Part 1, #3 Exhibit B Part 2, #4 Exhibit B Part 3, #5 Exhibit B Part 4, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sossamon, Meera) Modified on 4/24/2019 to replace as per rec doc 5 (KAH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.