Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Coastal Bridge Company, Inc. et al
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. |
Coastal Bridge Company, Inc. and Coastal Bridge Company, LLC |
3:2019cv00298 |
May 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Richard L Bourgeois |
Brian A Jackson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, #11 Amended Complaint, and #7 Amended Complaint by Coastal Bridge Company, Inc., Coastal Bridge Company, LLC.(Hicks, Michael) Modified on 6/26/2019 to edit the docket text (KMW). |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OPEN ACCOUNT AND BREACH OF CONTRACT against Coastal Bridge Company, Inc., Coastal Bridge Company, LLC, filed by Martin Marietta Materials, Inc..(Johnson, Edward) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Plead. Defendants Coastal Bridge Company, Inc. and Coastal Bridge Company, LLC are granted an extension of 21 days, or until 6/26/2019, to respond to plaintiffs complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 6/7/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (SGO) |
Filing 9 ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1653, that, on or before 6/13/2019, the plaintiff shall file an amended complaint providing the citizenship of Coastal Investment Holdings, LLC, by setting forth all citizenship particulars required to sustain federal diversity jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 6/6/2019. (KAH) |
Filing 8 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint, by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading; Order)(Hicks, Michael) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #8 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint, . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OPEN ACCOUNT AND BREACH OF CONTRACT against Coastal Bridge Company, Inc., Coastal Bridge Company, LLC, filed by Martin Marietta Materials, Inc..(Johnson, Edward) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1653, on or before 5/30/2019, the plaintiff shall file an amended complaint providing the citizenship of defendants Coastal Bridge Company, LLC and Coastal Bridge Company, Inc., by setting forth all citizenship particulars required to sustain federal diversity jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 5/23/2019. (SGO) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.. Coastal Bridge Company, Inc. served on 5/15/2019, answer due 6/5/2019; Coastal Bridge Company, LLC served on 5/15/2019, answer due 6/5/2019. (Johnson, Edward) |
Filing 4 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 7/25/2019 at 10:30 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr. Status Report due by 7/11/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 5/14/2019. (SGO) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Coastal Bridge Company, Inc., Coastal Bridge Company, LLC. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
Filing 2 Summons Submitted (Johnson, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT on Open Account and Breach of Contract against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-1940814.), filed by Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.