Jackson v. 16th Judical District et al
| Jazmine Jamal Jackson |
| Jackson Parish Detention Center, Concordia Detention Center, 16th Judical District, Elayne Hunts, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Rivers Correctional Center and Catahoula Correctional Center |
| 3:2019cv00309 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Richard L Bourgeois |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Prisoner Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Letter of Deficiency: The Clerk has filed your new suit. However, it is deficient in the areas as stated herein. The deficiency must be corrected within the given time frame. Amended Pleadings due by 7/10/2019. (KAH) |
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (EDC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Jazmine Jamal Jackson. (EDC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 16th Judical District, Catahoula Correctional Center, Concordia Detention Center, Elayne Hunts, Jackson Parish Detention Center, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Rivers Correctional Center, filed by Jazmine Jamal Jackson. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 Attachment, #3 envelope)(EDC) |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (EDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
