Williams v. Vannoy et al
Petitioner: David Lee Williams
Respondent: Jeff Landry and Darrel Vannoy
Case Number: 3:2019cv00350
Filed: May 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Brian A Jackson
Referring Judge: Erin Wilder-Doomes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw or to Dismiss Cause of Action by David Lee Williams. (Attachments: #1 Order)(LLH)
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Considering Plaintiff's #5 Motion for an Extension, wherein Plaintiff seeks an extension to correct the deficiencies noted in R. Doc. 3, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs #5 Motion for an Extension be GRANTED for good cause. Plaintiff shall file amended pleadings and/or provide the Court with the information and forms requested to correct the deficiencies noted in R. Doc. 3 by no later than July 10, 2019, or this action shall be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 6/17/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR)
June 17, 2019 MOTION(S) REFERRED: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File to file response to #3 Letter of Deficiency. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (EDC)
June 17, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/10/2019. (LLH)
June 13, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File to file response to #3 Letter of Deficiency by David Lee Williams. (EDC)
June 7, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Documents (Motion for Appointment of Counsel, Notice of Motion, Motion for Relief from a Final Judgment and Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis) Returned to the Inmate for Non Compliance with Local Rule 5(e)(1). Document returned electronically and original returned via USPS. (Attachments: #1 local rule, #2 Proposed Pleading;)(EDC)
June 4, 2019 Filing 3 Letter of Deficiency: The Clerk has filed your new suit. However, it is deficient in the areas as stated herein. The deficiency must be corrected within the given time frame. Amended Pleadings due by 6/25/2019. Filing Fee due by 6/25/2019. Statement of Account due by 6/25/2019. (SWE)
June 4, 2019 Filing 2 Letter to David Lee Williams Re: Future Compliance with Local Rule 5(e)(1) (Attachments: #1 local rule) (EDC)
May 28, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David Lee Williams.(EDC)
May 28, 2019 ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (EDC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Vannoy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Lee Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeff Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Darrel Vannoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?