Jackson et al v. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
Stylez Jackson and Thelma Jackson |
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children |
3:2019cv00607 |
September 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Brian A Jackson |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #6 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KAH) |
Filing 6 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint by National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. (Victorian, Michael) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children served on 10/11/2019, answer due 11/1/2019. (US Marshal, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Summons submitted to the USM for Service. (SWE) |
|
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Stylez Jackson, Thelma Jackson. (KMW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, filed by Thelma Jackson, Stylez Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(KMW) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.