Richardson v. Landry
Marcus Richardson |
Jeff Landry and Darrel Vannoy |
3:2019cv00634 |
September 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Shelly D Dick |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER: In order for this Court to determine the action, if any, that shall be taken on this application,the District Attorney for the Parish of West Baton Rouge shall file an answer & memo of authorities, along w/copies of all briefs & memoranda. Along with the response, The District Attorney for the 18th JDC Judicial District Court shall file an electronic certified copy of the state court record, including transcripts of all proceedings held in the state courts as well as a certified electronic copy of all documents. The Clerk of Court for the 18th JDC Judicial District Court shall file, in a conventional manner, not electronic, a courtesy copy of the entire state court record filed by the state. The Clerk of this Court serve, by any means which provides tracking and delivery confirmation, a copy of the entire application & this order on the Attorney General for the State of Louisiana, the District Attorney for the Parish of West Baton Rouge, and the Clerk of Court for 18th JDC Judicial District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 11/15/2019. (EDC) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/18/2019: #1 Attachment) (EDC). Modified on 11/18/2019 to add routing. (EDC). |
Confirmation of receipt of payment from Marcus Richardson #628267 in the amount of $5.00. Transaction posted on 11/8/2019. Receipt number 4699029851 processed by eclement. (TDA) |
Filing 6 ORDER : #5 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED. Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, Petitioner shall pay the filing fee of $5.00 to the Clerk of this Court.Filing Fee due by 10/31/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 10/10/2019. (ELW) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Marcus Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(KMW) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Documents (Statement of Account) Returned to the Inmate for Non Compliance with Local Rule 5(e)(1). Document returned electronically and original returned via USPS (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 5) (KMW) Modified on 10/8/2019 to edit the text (NLT). (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/8/2019 to correct the order of filing) (KMW). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/8/2019: #2 Proposed Pleading;) (KMW). |
Filing 3 Letter of Deficiency: The Clerk has filed your new suit. However, it is deficient in the areas as stated herein. The deficiency must be corrected within the given time frame. Filing Fee due by 10/14/2019. Statement of Account due by 10/14/2019. (KAH) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (KMW) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Marcus Richardson. (KMW) |
Filing 1 PETITION Under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State Custody, filed by Marcus Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Attachment Part 1, #3 Part 2)(KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.