Milow v. LeBlanc et al
| Dante L Milow |
| Antonio Whitaker, John Doe, Peter Lollis, Darrel Vannoy and James LeBlanc |
| 3:2019cv00717 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Richard L Bourgeois |
| Brian A Jackson |
| Prisoner Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. It is ordered that the plaintiff pay an initial partial filing fee of $6.50 in accordance with 28 USC 1915. A copy of this order shall be sent to the plaintiff and to Centralized Inmate Banking. Filing Fee due by 11/21/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 10/31/2019. (SWE)
|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Dante L Milow. (KMW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe(Captain, in his individual and official capacity), John Doe(Lieutenant, in his individual and official capacity), James LeBlanc, Peter Lollis, Darrel Vannoy, Antonio Whitaker, filed by Dante L Milow. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Statement of Claim, #2 Attachment)(KMW) |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
