Medical Pharmacy, Inc. v. The United States Drug Enforcement Administration et al
Plaintiff: Medical Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant: Uttam Dhillon, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, William Barr and The United States Drug Enforcement Administration
Case Number: 3:2019cv00868
Filed: December 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Richard L Bourgeois
Referring Judge: Brian A Jackson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2020 Filing 19 Supplemental MEMORANDUM Regarding #2 MOTION for Hearing for a To Dissolve Immediate Suspension filed by Medical Pharmacy, Inc.. (Koch, Karl) Modified on 1/10/2020 to edit text (LT).
January 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #11 MOTION for Leave of Court to Substitute Exhibit E filed by Medical Pharmacy, Inc. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 1/9/2020. (LLH)
January 9, 2020 Filing 17 Reply to #2 Motion for Hearing To Dissolve Immediate Suspension Order Pursuant To 21 USC 824(d) And Request For Expedited Hearing, or Alternatively For Temporary Restraining Order filed by Medical Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit F)(EDC) ( #2 Attachment Exhibit E) (LLH). Modified on 1/9/2020 to add exhibit E (LLH).
January 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 1/9/2020. (EDC)
January 9, 2020 Filing 15 Supplemental RESPONSE in Opposition to #2 MOTION for Hearing for a To Dissolve Immediate Suspension Order Pursuant To 21 USC 824(d) And Request For Expedited Hearing, or Alternatively For Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Expedited Hearing MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by All Defendants. (Zachary, Chase)
January 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 RULING AND ORDER denying #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. With respect to Plaintiff's Motion to Dissolve the Immediate Suspension Order pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(d), the parties are ordered to provide supplemental briefing on the issue of whether Plaintiff has satisfied the elements required for motion to dissolve. The parties shall file their briefs by 1/9/2020 and shall be limited to 7 pages. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 1/7/2020. (SWE)
January 7, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #2 MOTION for Hearing for a To Dissolve Immediate Suspension Order Pursuant To 21 USC 824(d) And Request For Expedited Hearing. (SWE)
January 6, 2020 Filing 13 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Brian A. Jackson: Evidentiary Hearing held on 1/6/2020. Matter of jurisdiction is discussed. Counsel agree that jurisdiction is proper in this Court as to the Motion filed by Plaintiff to Dissolve Immediate Suspension Order, or alternatively, Motion for Temporary Restraining Order(Doc. 2). Counsel presents oral argument to the Court. For reasons read into the record, Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is denied. As instructed by the Court, Counsel shall simultaneously file Briefs, limited to 7 pages in length, as to whether Plaintiff has satisfied elements required to dissolve the Immediate Suspension Order. Briefs shall be filed by the close of business on 1/9/2020. (Court Reporter N. Breaux.) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (PJH)
January 3, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave of Court to Substitute Exhibit by Medical Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Revised Exhibit E)(Koch, Karl) Modified on 1/3/2020 to edit text (LT).
January 3, 2020 Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition to #9 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum filed by All Defendants. (Zachary, Chase)
January 3, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading; Reply Memorandum, #2 Exhibit E to Proposed Reply Memorandum, #3 Exhibit F to Proposed Reply Memorandum)(Koch, Karl) Modified on 1/3/2020 to restrict Exhibit E (LLH). Modified on 1/9/2020 to replace exhibit E as per Order #18 and remove restriction (LLH).
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: A hearing on #1 Complaint for Dissolution of Ex Parte Immediate Suspension Order Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(d), or for Injunctive Relief is scheduled for 1/6/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 before Judge Brian A. Jackson.Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 12/30/2019. (EDC)
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Enroll Additional Counsel of Record. Attorney John Joseph Gaupp is enrolled as co-counsel of record for Defendants William Barr, Uttam Dhillon, and The United States Drug Enforcement Administration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 12/30/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (SGO)
December 23, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Enroll John J. Gaupp as Additional Attorney by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Zachary, Chase)
December 23, 2019 Filing 5 Response to #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed by All Defendants. (Zachary, Chase) Modified on 12/23/2019 to edit text. (EDC).
December 23, 2019 MOTION(S) REFERRED: #6 MOTION to Enroll John J. Gaupp as Additional Attorney . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (EDC)
December 18, 2019 Filing 12 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Brian A. Jackson: Telephone Conference held on 12/18/2019. Matter discussed. Government's response shall be filed by 12/23/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (PJH)
December 18, 2019 Filing 4 Notice to Counsel: Telephone Conference set for 12/19/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Brian A. Jackson. Counsel for the Plaintiff shall notify the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Louisiana of the filing of this matter. Counsel for the Plaintiff shall initiate the call to Assistant United States Attorney for the Middle District of Louisiana then to the Court at 225-389-3692. Evidence, in electronic format, shall be provided in accordance with Local Rule 79 and Administrative Procedures.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.)(PJH)
December 18, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to William Barr, Uttam Dhillon, The United States Drug Enforcement Administration. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons)(EDC)
December 17, 2019 Filing 2 Motion to Dissolve Immediate Suspension Order Pursuant To 21 USC 824(d) and Request For Expedited Hearing, or Alternatively Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Medical Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Pleading; Order)(Koch, Karl) Modified on 12/18/2019 to edit text. (EDC). Added MOTION for Expedited Hearing, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order on 12/18/2019 (EDC).
December 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Dissolution of Ex Parte Immediate Suspension Order Pursuant To 21 USC 824(d), Or For Injunctive Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-2046977.), filed by Medical Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - DEA Order, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Declaration of Morrison, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Declaration of Bryce, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Declaration of Vicellio, #5 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Attachment Summons - DEA, #7 Attachment Summons - Dhillon, #8 Attachment Summons - Barr)(Koch, Karl) Modified on 12/19/2019 to edit receipt number.(DCB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medical Pharmacy, Inc. v. The United States Drug Enforcement Administration et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uttam Dhillon
Represented By: Chase Evan Zachary
Represented By: John Joseph Gaupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Drug Enforcement Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Barr
Represented By: Chase Evan Zachary
Represented By: John Joseph Gaupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United States Drug Enforcement Administration
Represented By: Chase Evan Zachary
Represented By: John Joseph Gaupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Medical Pharmacy, Inc.
Represented By: Karl J. Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?