Foots v. Rodriguez et al
Danyelle Foots |
National Specialty Insurance Company, Javier Rodriguez and JEC Transportation, LLC |
3:2020cv00144 |
March 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Shelly D Dick |
Scott D Johnson |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 6/11/2020 at 09:00 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson. Status Report due by 5/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 3/24/2020. (KAH) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by JEC Transportation, LLC, National Specialty Insurance Company, Javier Rodriguez.(Dragna, Gerard) |
Filing 2 Letter to Attorney Brian M. Caubarreaux regarding Brock H. Duke who is Co-Counsel for party Danyelle Foots. Attorney is not admitted to practice in LAMD. (LT) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 18th JDC, Parish of West Baton Rouge, Case Number 45852. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-2088857), filed by JEC Transportation, LLC, National Specialty Insurance Company, Javier Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Verification, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 List of Parties, #8 List of Pleadings, #9 Exhibit 1, #10 Exhibit 2, #11 Exhibit 3)(Dragna, Gerard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.