Thompkins v. Tanner et al
Glen Thompkins |
Darryl Mizell, Jonathan Stringer, Robert C Tanner, Mike Barber and Keith Bickham |
3:2020cv00191 |
March 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Brian A Jackson |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Prisoner Conditions |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Return on Electronic Transfer from Eastern District of Louisiana. (KMW) |
Filing 7 Extraction Log of a case Transferred to Eastern District of Louisiana. (KMW) |
|
|
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #4 MOTION to Amend the Complaint. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Amend the Complaint by Glen Thompkins for to Add a Party. (KMW) Modified on 4/20/2020 to edit the event type and docket text (KMW). |
Filing 3 Letter dated 4/1/2020 from Glen Thompkins to Clerk of Court Re: Party Names (KMW) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Glen Thompkins. (KMW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mike Barber, Keith Bickham, Darryl Mizell, Jonathan Stringer, Robert C Tanner, filed by Glen Thompkins. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(KMW) |
***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.