Patterson v. McDermitt et al
| Mark Patterson |
| Baton Rouge Police Department, Murphy Paul, Jr. and Marshall McDermitt |
| 3:2020cv00204 |
| April 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| John W deGravelles |
| Scott D Johnson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Letter to Attorney Roberta L. Burns regarding Sidney D. Torres III, Beau F. Camel, and Valerie L. Rodrigue who is Co-Counsel for party Mark Patterson. Attorneys are not admitted to practice in LAMD. (KMW) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Baton Rouge Police Department, Marshall McDermitt, Murphy Paul, Jr.. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (KMW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-2097371.), filed by Mark Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Summons, #3 Attachment Summons, #4 Attachment Summons)(Poolson, Daniel) (Attachments 1-4 replaced on 4/3/2020 to flatten the documents) (KMW). |
| Case Reassigned to Judge John W. deGravelles. Judge Brian A. Jackson no longer assigned to the case. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
