King v. Kottemann Law Firm et al
Plaintiff: Shelita King
Defendant: Kottemann Law Firm and Stanley Kottemann, Jr.
Case Number: 3:2020cv00340
Filed: June 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Brian A Jackson
Referring Judge: Erin Wilder-Doomes
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2020 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel: In light of the #6 Waivers of Service filed, the Scheduling Conference is reset for 10/8/2020 at 10:00 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. Status Report due by 9/24/2020.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR)
July 8, 2020 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Shelita King. Kottemann Law Firm waiver sent on 6/29/2020, answer due 8/28/2020; Stanley Kottemann, Jr. waiver sent on 6/29/2020, answer due 8/28/2020. (Zelman, Yitzchak)
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Yitzchak Zelman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 06/23/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR)
June 23, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Yitzchak Zelman, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2131388) by Shelita King. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Oath on Admission, #3 Proposed Order, #4 NJ Certificate of Good Standing)(Raburn, Jonathan)
June 23, 2020 MOTION(S) REFERRED: #4 MOTION for Yitzchak Zelman, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2131388). This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW)
June 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 8/6/2020 at 11:30 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. Status Report due by 7/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 6/5/2020. (ELW)
June 5, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Kottemann Law Firm. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (LT)
June 5, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kottemann Law Firm, Stanley Kottemann, Jr. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-2123050.), filed by Shelita King. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Defendant's Collection Letter, #3 Summons)(Raburn, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Kottemann Law Firm et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kottemann Law Firm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stanley Kottemann, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelita King
Represented By: Jonathan Raburn
Represented By: Yitzchak Zelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?