Russell Coleman Contracting, Inc. v. ELA Group, Inc. et al
Russell Coleman Contracting, Inc. and Russell Coleman Contacting, Inc. |
United Fire and Casualty Company, ELA Group Inc. and ELA Group, Inc. |
3:2020cv00531 |
August 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Richard L Bourgeois |
Brian A Jackson |
Miller Act |
40 U.S.C. ยง 270 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Russell Coleman Contacting, Inc.. All Defendants. (Kaster, Craig) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Russell Coleman Contacting, Inc. (Kaster, Craig) |
Filing 2 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 11/19/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr.. Status Report due by 11/5/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 9/11/2020. (EDC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Russell Coleman Contracting, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-2157259.), filed by Russell Coleman Contracting, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Request for Admissions of Fact, #3 Request for Admissions of Fact, #4 Verification, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Notice of Lawsuit and Waiver of Summons)(Kaster, Craig) (Attachments 5 and 6 replaced on 8/18/2020 to correct page orientation) (KMW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.