Davis et al v. Saul
Plaintiff: Brett Deshawn Davis
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2020cv00621
Filed: September 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: John W deGravelles
Referring Judge: Erin Wilder-Doomes
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 402
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: This action for judicial review of the administrative decision shall proceed in accordance with the schedule stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 11/2/2020. (BLR)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Confirmation of receipt of payment from Brett D. Davis in the amount of $400.00. Transaction posted on 10/29/2020. Receipt number 4699030560 processed by kwilcox. (TDA)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RULING AND ORDER denying #4 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must pay the $400.00 filing fee by 11/4/2020. The Clerk of Court shall serve this Order on Plaintiff by regular mail and by certified mail, return receipt requested. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 10/21/2020. (EDC)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order MOTION(S) REFERRED: #4 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (EDC)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brett Deshawn Davis. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 Attachment, #3 Attachment, #4 envelope)(EDC)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certified Mail Returned Executed as to Brett Davis re #2 Order (IFP on Appeal), (KMW)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, the plaintiff shall submit to this Court either $400.00 or complete and submit the attached form, AO 239 - Application To Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). The clerks office is to serve this order to the plaintiff via certified mail return receipt requested to the address listed on PACER.Filing Fee due by 10/8/2020. Application shall be filed by 10/8/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 9/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 AO239 Long Form)(KMW) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/18/2020 to add certified routing information) (KMW).
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Brett Deshawn Davis. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(KMW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis et al v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brett Deshawn Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?