Ross v. Saul
| Kimberly Ross |
| ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv00629 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Richard L Bourgeois |
| John W deGravelles |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kimberly Ross. (Meunier, Adam)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kimberly Ross. Social Security Administration served on 9/24/2020, answer due 11/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 SUMMONS RETURN RECEIPT)(Meunier, Adam)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: This action for judicial review of the administrative decision shall proceed in accordance with the schedule stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 10/05/2020. (ELW)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (KMW)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-2174528.), filed by Kimberly Ross. (Attachments: #1 COVERSHEET, #2 SUMMONS, #3 SUMMONS, #4 SUMMONS)(Meunier, Adam) (Attachments 1-4 replaced on 9/22/2020 to flatten the documents) (KMW).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
