Haynes v. Goodwin et al
Thomas Haynes |
Jerry Goodwin and Jeff Landry |
3:2020cv00809 |
November 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
John W deGravelles |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 RULING denying #4 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 12/21/2020. (EDC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE/MOTION for Reconsideration of #3 Ruling by Thomas Haynes. (Attachments: #1 cover letter)(KMW) |
Filing 3 RULING: The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be deemed successive, and that it be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction because Petitioner did not obtain permission from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit prior to filing and that the pending #2 Motion be TERMINATED. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 12/4/2020. (EDC) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Thomas Haynes. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(KMW) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Thomas Haynes. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Attachment 1, #3 Attachment 2, #4 Attachment 3, #5 Attachment 4, #6 Cover Letter)(KMW) |
***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.