King v. Lowenburg et al
| Jacob Zachary King |
| Benjamin Lowenburg and ELMHS |
| 3:2021cv00171 |
| March 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Prisoner Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #3 Declaration in Support of In Forma Pauperis and Inability to Continue Pro-Se. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
| Filing 3 Declaration in Support of In Forma Pauperis and Inability to Continue Pro-Se filed by Jacob Zachary King. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KMW) Modified on 5/19/2021 to edit the docket text and event type (KMW). |
| Filing 2 Letter of Deficiency: The Clerk has filed your new suit. However, it is deficient in the areas as stated herein. The deficiency must be corrected within the given time frame. Amended Pleadings due by 5/21/2021. Filing Fee due by 5/21/2021. Statement of Account due by 5/21/2021. (LLH) RD 2 RESENT to plaintiff on 5/11/2021 (KMW). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT/Declaration of Criminal Prevention of Civil Rights Enforcement against ELMHS, Benjamin Lowenburg, filed by Jacob Zachary King. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Cover Letter)(KMW) |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
