Ford v. Ruble
Thomas Ford |
Charles Ruble, Angel Johnson, Chadrick Bell, Amyri Johnson, Alexis Johnson, Desmond Squall, Kechia T. Johnson, Naomi Walker and Sharron Walker |
3:2021cv00395 |
July 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
John W deGravelles |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to withhold issuance of summons until further order of the Court. No service shall be made by the United States Marshal's Service at this time. A copy of this order shall be sent to the plaintiff and to Centralized Inmate Banking. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 7/29/2021. (ELW) Modified on 7/30/2021 to add text (NLT). |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Thomas Ford. (EDC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Ruble, Angel Johnson, Chadrick Bell, Amyri Johnson, Alexis Johnson, Desmond Squall, Kechia T. Johnson, Naomi Walker and Sharron Walker filed by Thomas Ford. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(EDC) Modified on 7/29/2021 to add parties per chambers. (EDC). |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ., ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (EDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.