Mitchell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
| M.D. CHARLES MITCHELL, II and Charles F. Mitchell, II |
| UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS |
| 3:2021cv00478 |
| August 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Brian A Jackson |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting for good cause the #8 Third Unopposed Motion to Continue Responsive Pleading Deadline, filed by the United States. The government's responsive pleading to Plaintiff's [1-2, pp. 1-11] Petition for Declaratory Judgment due no later than November 17, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 10/8/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (EWD)
|
|
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #8 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Responsive Pleadings Deadline . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT)
|
|
Filing 8
Unopposed MOTION to Continue Responsive Pleadings Deadline by United States Army Corps of Engineers. (Green, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Consent MOTION to Continue Responsive Pleadings Deadline for good cause shown. United States of America responsive pleading deadline is reset to 10/18/201. In light of the extension, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Status Report is nowr due by 11/18/2021. Scheduling Conference reset for 12/2/2021 at 10:00 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 9/17/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR)
|
|
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #6 Consent MOTION to Continue Responsive Pleadings Deadline . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (BLR)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent MOTION to Continue Responsive Pleadings Deadline by United States Army Corps of Engineers. (Waldref, Vanessa)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Unopposed Motion to Continue Responsive Pleadings Deadline, filed by the United States of America. Responsive pleadings for Defendant United States Army Corps of Engineers due 9/16/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 09/02/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (EWD)
|
|
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (ELW)
|
|
Filing 4
Unopposed MOTION to Continue Responsive Pleadings Deadline by United States Army Corps of Engineers. (Waldref, Vanessa) Modified on 8/27/2021 to edit text (ELW).
|
|
Filing 3
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 11/10/2021 at 09:30 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. Status Report due by 10/27/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 8/24/2021. (BLR)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance Attorney Representing the United States of America by UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (Green, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 23rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Case Number 131861. (), filed by United States Army Corps of Engineers.(Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Index, #2 Exhibit B State Court Record, #3 Exhibit C Civil Cover Sheet)(Green, Katherine) (Attachments 2 & 3 replaced on 8/20/2021 to rotate pages, flatten document and edit text.) (EDC).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
