Ricks v. Louisiana State Penitentiary et al
Wesley Ricks |
Louisiana State Penitentiary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections and John Doe |
3:2021cv00504 |
August 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
John W deGravelles |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Motion for Leave to Appeal/Writ of Supervisory Control/Notice of AppealL of #2 Order by Wesley Ricks. (EDC) Modified on 10/13/2021 to edit text. (EDC). |
Filing 2 ORDER: Ricks did not pay the required $402.00 filing fee when he filed the Complaint, nor did he file an application to proceed without prepaying the costs (IFP Motion). Even if Ricks had filed an IFP Motion, he is not permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this case. Plaintiff shall pay $402.00, the full amount of the Courts filing fee. The filing fee must be paid in full in a single payment. No partial payments will be accepted. Filing Fee due by 10/27/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 10/06/2021. (ELW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Public Safety and Corrections, John Doe(Black male), John Doe(white male), Louisiana State Penitentiary, filed by Wesley Ricks. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(EDC) |
***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (EDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.