Simms v. Hooper et al
| Sedrick Simms |
| Timothy Hooper, L. Ramsey, J. Mancheser, P. Smith, D. Vannoy, Cole R. Wright, L.S.P. Mental Health Department and R. Wright |
| 3:2021cv00612 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| John W deGravelles |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Prisoner Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. It is ordered that the plaintiff pay an initial partial filing fee of $0.00 in accordance with 28 USC 1915. A copy of this order shall be sent to the plaintiff and to Centralized Inmate Banking. The Clerk of Court is directed to withhold issuance of summons until further order of the Court. No service shall be made by the United States Marshal's Service at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 11/23/2021. (LLH)
|
|
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (EDC)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Sedrick Simms. (EDC)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Timothy Hooper, L.S.P. Mental Health Department, J. Mancheser, L. Ramsey, P. Smith, D. Vannoy, Cole R. Wright, filed by Sedrick Simms.(EDC)
|
|
***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (EDC)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
