Pedigo v. Walmart Inc. et al
Mary Pedigo |
Walmart Inc. and Walmart Claims Services, Inc. |
Danielle Thompson |
3:2021cv00711 |
December 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
John W deGravelles |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel: The #6 Joint Status Report indicates that the parties consent to proceed before the magistrate judge. If the parties wish to consent, they need to execute the attached consent form and file it into the record by no later than 2/10/2022. (BLR) |
Filing 6 Joint STATUS REPORT by Mary Pedigo. (Bursavich, George) |
![]() |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #4 MOTION to Enroll George Bursavich as Attorney . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (SWE) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Enroll George Bursavich as Attorney by Mary Pedigo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading; Order)(Bursavich, George) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Letter to Attorney Danielle Thompson who is lead counsel and George O.Bursavich who is Co-Counsel for party Plaintiff, Mary Pedigo are not admitted to practice in LAMD. (ELW) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 19th JDC, Case Number 711421. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAMDC-2375195), filed by Walmart Claims Services, Inc., Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(DeRojas, Isidro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.