Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections & Public Safety et al
| Damon Landor |
| Louisiana Department of Corrections & Public Safety, James M LeBlanc, Raymond Laborde Correctional Center, Marcus Meyers, John Does 1-10 and ABC Entities 1-10 |
| 3:2021cv00733 |
| December 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Rook Elizabeth Ringer to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 1/10/2022. ATTENTION: Local counsel shall provide the following link to those attorneys granted leave to proceed pro hac vice in the Middle District of Louisiana who choose to register for e-file access #www.lamd.uscourts.gov/pro-hac-vice-e-filing-registration. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (KAH)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Ex Parte MOTION to Substitute Exhibit in Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by Damon Landor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 1/7/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (KAH)
|
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 3/24/2022 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson. Status Report due by 3/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 1/7/2022. (KAH)
|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #5 Ex Parte MOTION to Substitute Exhibit in Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (LLH) |
| Filing 5 Ex Parte MOTION to Substitute Exhibit in Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Damon Landor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Certification for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Rook E. Ringer, Esq., #2 Attachment Proposed Order)(Denson, Casey) |
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #4 Ex Parte MOTION for Rook Elizabeth Ringer to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2380382). This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT) |
| Filing 4 Ex Parte MOTION for Rook Elizabeth Ringer to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2380382) by Damon Landor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Certificate of Good Standing of Applicant Attorney, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-Certification of Applicant Attorney, #3 Attachment Proposed Order)(Denson, Casey) Modified on 1/10/2022 to replace exhibit B as per Order #7 (LLH). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to James M LeBlanc, Louisiana Department of Corrections & Public Safety, Marcus Meyers, Raymond Laborde Correctional Center. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons, #3 summons)(EDC) |
| Filing 2 Letter to Attorney Casey Denson regarding Rook Elizabeth Ringer who is Co-Counsel for party Damon Landor. Attorney is not admitted to practice in LAMD. (EDC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAMDC-2378035.), filed by Damon Landor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Attachment Summons LADCPS, #6 Attachment Summons LeBlanc, #7 Attachment Summons RLCC, #8 Attachment Summons Meyers)(Denson, Casey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
