Bell v. Hawkins et al
James C Bell |
Unknown Hawkin, Randy Lavespere, Kelley Hawkin, Son Hawkin, Jean Doe and Unknown Watson |
3:2022cv00168 |
March 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
John W deGravelles |
Scott D Johnson |
Prisoner Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE OF Second Step Response Form by James C Bell (NLT) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jean Doe, Kelley Hawkin, Son Hawkin, Unknown Hawkin, Randy Lavespere, Unknown Watson, filed by James C Bell.(EDC) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF Statement of Claim by James C Bell (NLT) |
Filing 4 Letter to James C. Bell Re: Future Compliance with Local Rule 5(d)(1) (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 5) (NLT) |
***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS), MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account, #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by James C Bell. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support, #2 Memorandum in Support)(NLT) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by James C Bell. (NLT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jean Doe, Kelley Hawkin, Son Hawkin, Unknown Hawkins, Randy Lavespere, Unknown Watson, filed by James C Bell.(NLT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.