Scurria v. LF Holdings, LLC et al
| Joshua Scurria |
| LF Holdings, LLC and Dance Tech, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00187 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Dance Tech, Inc..(Emonet, Scott) |
Filing 9
ORDER: Because defense counsel represents that he was only recently hired by Defendants, the #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendants is GRANTED. Defendants both now have until June 6, 2022, to file responsive pleadings. The Court notes that this is the second Motion filed by Defendants in this case that references "Appellants" and a "briefing schedule" where none has yet been set in this case and reminds counsel that this is not an appellate action. Counsel additionally is reminded that any future motions seeking extensions of time must demonstrate good cause and, if filed after the deadline at issue has passed, show excusable neglect for missing said deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 5/17/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (KAH)
|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants. (Emonet, Scott) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Before the Court is a #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, filed by Defendants. As Defendants have not met the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P 6(b) by failing to demonstrate good cause for the extension or establish excusable neglect for the timing of the motion, and because the requirements of Local Civil Rule 7(a) have not been met, this Motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 5/6/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (KAH)
|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (ELW) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Dance Tech, Inc.. (Emonet, Scott) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joshua Scurria. Dance Tech, Inc. served on 4/8/2022, answer due 4/29/2022. (Bizer, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joshua Scurria. LF Holdings, LLC served on 4/24/2022, answer due 5/16/2022. (Bizer, Andrew) |
|
Filing 3
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 7/7/2022 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson. Status Report due by 6/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 3/29/2022. (KAH)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DANCE TECH, INC., LF HOLDINGS, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAMDC-2408317.), filed by Joshua Scurria. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Bizer, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
