Vo et al v. Entergy Company et al
| Minh Vo, Huong Troung, Minh-Tri Vo, Anna Vo, Sang Vo and Richard Vo |
| Entergy Company and City Sewer |
| 3:2022cv00255 |
| April 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STATUS REPORT by Huong Troung, Anna Vo, Minh Vo, Minh-Tri Vo, Richard Vo, Sang Vo. (NLT) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF Request for Damages by Huong Troung, Anna Vo, Minh Vo, Minh-Tri Vo, Richard Vo, Sang Vo (NLT) |
Filing 2
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 8/4/2022 at 10:30 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. Status Report due by 7/21/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 4/27/2022. (BLR)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City Sewer, Entergy Company (Filing fee $ 402.00) Receipt no. 31583, filed by Richard Vo, Minh-Tri Vo, Huong Troung, Anna Vo, Minh Vo, Sang Vo. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 cover letter, #3 envelope)(EDC) Modified on 4/19/2022 to add payment information. (EDC). (Main Document 1 and Attachment 2 replaced on 4/21/2022) (EDC). Modified on 4/21/2022 to redact personal information.(EDC). |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Pro Se (non-inmate) Flag (EDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
