Ross v. LeBlanc
Ira Jerome Ross |
James LeBlanc |
3:2022cv00299 |
May 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Shelly D Dick |
Scott D Johnson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 GENERAL ORDER: All pleadings and other papers filed under seal in civil and criminal actions shall be maintained under seal for thirty days following final disposition of the action. After that time, all sealed pleadings and other papers shall be placed in the case record unless a District Judge or Magistrate Judge, upon motion and for good cause shown, orders that the pleading or other paper be maintained under seal. The deadline for filing any motions regarding the unsealing of any document shall be within thirty days of the final disposition of any action and shall contain a concise statement of reasons for maintaining the pleading or other paper under seal. ATTENTION: If a motion to retain documents under seal is NOT filed, all documents shall be placed in the public case record, unless specifically identified in the attached General Order Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/8/2019. (JEG) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's claims be and are hereby DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure of Plaintiff to pay the Court's filing fee. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/1/2022. (JEG) |
Filing 4 RULING: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned proceeding be DISMISSEDWITHOUT PREJUDICE as set forth in document. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pending #3 Motion to Transfer this Case to the Criminal Division is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/1/2022. (JEG) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #3 MOTION to Transfer this Case to the Criminal Division. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Transfer this Case to the Criminal Division by Ira Jerome Ross. (NLT) |
Filing 2 ORDER: Plaintiff is not permitted to proceed in this case without prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, Ross shall pay $402.00, the full amount of the Courts filing fee. The filing fee must be paid in full in a single payment. No partial payments will be accepted. Filing Fee due by 6/22/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 6/1/2022. (ELW) |
***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (NLT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James LeBlanc, filed by Ira Jerome Ross. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(NLT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ross v. LeBlanc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ira Jerome Ross | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: James LeBlanc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.