Rahman v. The Home Depot
| Lynetta Davis Rahman and Lynetta G. Davis Rahman |
| The Home Depot |
| 3:2022cv00323 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Brian A Jackson |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Parties by The Home Depot identifying Other Affiliate Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. for The Home Depot. (Kogos, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Home Depot identifying Corporate Parent The Home Depot, Inc. for The Home Depot.. (Kogos, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for More Definite Statement by The Home Depot (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Kogos, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lynetta G. Davis Rahman. The Home Depot served on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. (EDC) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to The Home Depot. (NOTICE: Handed over counter for service ) (ELW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Home Depot (Filing fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 31640), filed by Lynetta Davis Rahman. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(EDC) Modified on 5/19/2022 to add payment information.(EDC). |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Pro Se (non-inmate) Flag (EDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
