Naquin v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Christie L Naquin |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv00543 |
| August 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: This action for judicial review of the administrative decision shall proceed in accordance with the schedule stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 8/23/2022. (KAH)
|
|
Filing 9
Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (NOTICE: Summons submitted to the USM for service) (ELW)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall file said complaint without prepayment of costs or security thereof.Plaintiff is responsible for submitting the summons and address for the defendant(s). The USM shall serve the summons. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 08/11/2022. (ELW) Modified on 8/12/2022 to edit the text (NLT).
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Edward A. Wicklund to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 8/11/2022. ATTENTION: Local counsel shall provide the following link to those attorneys granted leave to proceed pro hac vice in the Middle District of Louisiana who choose to register for e-file access #www.lamd.uscourts.gov/pro-hac-vice-e-filing-registration. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (KAH)
|
|
Filing 6
Certificate of Interested Parties by Christie L Naquin identifying Affiliate/Interested Person Kilolo Kijakazi, Affiliate/Interested Person Edward A. Wicklund, Affiliate/Interested Person Benjamin M. Misko,, Affiliate/Interested Person Olinsky & Associates, PLLC, Affiliate/Interested Person Christie L. Naquin for Christie L Naquin. (Misko, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY with LR 7.1 as to #3 Certificate of Interested Parties. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1, A certificate of interested persons must be filed and the interested persons added to CM/ECF by the filer. REQUIRED CORRECTION: The filer shall add all interested persons listed on the certificate using the event Add Interested Person located under Notices in the CM/ECF system. (ELW)
|
|
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #4 MOTION for Edward A. Wicklund to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2461163), #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (ELW)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Edward A. Wicklund to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2461163) by Christie L Naquin (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)(Misko, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 3
Certificate of Interested Parties by Christie L Naquin (Misko, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christie L Naquin (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Misko, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Christie L Naquin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons)(Misko, Benjamin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
