Williams v. Nettles
| Reginald Williams |
| John Doe Nettles, Mark LaPrairie, John Doe Jack and John Doe Simmon |
| 3:2022cv00558 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Brian A Jackson |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Prisoner Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Reginald Williams. It is ordered that the plaintiff pay an initial partial filing fee of $34.36 in accordance with 28 USC 1915. A copy of this order shall be sent to the plaintiff and to Centralized Inmate Banking. Filing Fee due by 9/16/2022. The Clerk of Court is directed to withhold issuance of summons until further order of the Court. No service shall be made by the United States Marshal's Service at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 8/26/2022. (JEG)
|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ., ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (NLT) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Reginald Williams (NLT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe Jack, Mark LaPrairie, John Doe Nettles, John Doe Simmon, filed by Reginald Williams.(NLT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
