Sharper v. RAMCO- Right Away Maintenance Company
| Adrian D Sharper |
| RAMCO- Right Away Maintenance Company |
| 3:2022cv00560 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Brian A Jackson |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY with LR 7.1 as to #8 Answer to Complaint. Failure to file a Certificate of Interested Persons REQUIRED CORRECTION: Within one business day, the filer shall file a Certificate of Interested Persons and the interested persons shall be added to CM/ECF by the filer using the event Certificate of Interested Persons. (EDC)
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by RAMCO- Right Away Maintenance Company.(Mulcahy, Melanie)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall file his responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint by 10/12/2022. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 9/19/2022. (LLH)
|
|
Filing 6
First MOTION for Extension of Time Responsive Pleadings by RAMCO- Right Away Maintenance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zeringue, Nicholas)
|
|
***Set CASE REFERRED Pro Se (non-inmate) Flag (ELW)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to RAMCO- Right Away Maintenance Company. (NOTICE:Summons Mailed to Pro-Se Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (LLH)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall file said complaint without prepayment of costs or security thereof and the Clerk is directed to issue process to the defendant(s). The plaintiff(s) is responsible for service of summons and complaint on the defendant(s). Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 8/18/2022. (LLH)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adrian D Sharper (ELW)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Adrian D Sharper (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading;)(ELW)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 0.), filed by Adrian D Sharper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(ELW)
|
|
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #3 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (ELW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sharper v. RAMCO- Right Away Maintenance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adrian D Sharper | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RAMCO- Right Away Maintenance Company | |
| Represented By: | Melanie Mabile Mulcahy |
| Represented By: | Nicholas J. Zeringue |
| Represented By: | Anna Catharina Vastbinder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
