Roshell v. Arnold et al
| Daryl Germaine Roshell |
| James Arnold and Lucas Rheams |
| 3:2022cv00700 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Prisoner Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Documents (Motion for IFP) Returned to the Inmate for Non Compliance with Local Rule 5(d)(1). Document returned electronically and original returned via USPS (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 5, #2 Proposed Pleading; Motion for IFP)(NLT) |
| Filing 4 R. Doc. 4 no longer exists docketed in error. (BLR) Modified to edit text on 11/2/2022 (BLR). |
| Filing 3 Letter of Deficiency: The Clerk has filed your new suit. However, it is deficient in the areas as stated herein. The deficiency must be corrected within the given time frame. Filing Fee due by 11/14/2022. Statement of Account due by 11/14/2022. (ELW) |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS), MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Daryl Germaine Roshell (NLT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Arnold, Lucas Rheams, filed by Daryl Germaine Roshell.(NLT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
