Anderson v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Anderson
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Personal Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2022cv00753
Filed: October 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Richard L Bourgeois
Referring Judge: Brian A Jackson
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 2/2/2023 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr. Counsel for Plaintiff(s) shall initiate the call to all parties then contact the Court at (225) 389-3602. Status Report due by 1/19/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 11/29/2022. (SGO)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Personal Insurance Company. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (Attachments: #1 Summons summons, #2 Summons summons)(EDC)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Nathaniel Anderson identifying Affiliate/Interested Person Liberty Personal Insurance Company, Affiliate/Interested Person Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Affiliate/Interested Person Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company for Nathaniel Anderson. (Huye, R.)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAMDC-2487781.), filed by Nathaniel Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons 1, #3 Summons Summons 2, #4 Summons Summons 3)(Huye, R.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Anderson
Represented By: R. William Huye, III
Represented By: Cameron Sean Snowden
Represented By: Claude F. Reynaud, III
Represented By: Grant P. Gardiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Personal Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?