Thomas et al v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
| Christina Lee Thomas |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Debra S. Shifrin |
| General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 3:2023cv00477 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: This action for judicial review of the administrative decision shall proceed in accordance with the schedule stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 7/20/2023. (LLH)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Counsel's #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and #5 Motion for Special Admission are both GRANTED, as the requirements of this Court's Local Rules 83(8) (visiting attorneys) and 83(9) (waiver of local counsel requirement) are both met. Attorney Debra S. Shifrin will be added to the docket as counsel of record for Plaintiff Christina Lee Thomas, and Local Rule 83(8)'s requirement for local counsel is waived by the Court pursuant to Local Rule 83(9). To be clear, this waiver is limited to Ms. Shifrin's representation of Plaintiff in this litigation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 6/28/2023. ATTENTION: Local counsel shall provide the following link to those attorneys granted leave to proceed pro hac vice in the Middle District of Louisiana who choose to register for e-file access #www.lamd.uscourts.gov/pro-hac-vice-e-filing-registration. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (KAH)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Special Admission/ to Waive Local Counsel Requirement by Christina Lee Thomas (Attachments: #1 Certificates of Good Standing, #2 Cover Letter)(JEG) |
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #5 MOTION for Special Admission MOTION to Waive Local Counsel Requirement. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (JEG) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Service: Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), effective December 1, 2022, the Clerk of Court notified both the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Louisiana of the commencement of this action by transmission of a Notice of Electronic Filing. Accordingly, the plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. (JEG) |
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #3 MOTION for Debra S. Shifrin to Appear Pro Hac Vice. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (JEG) |
| Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 32438. (EDC) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Debra S. Shifrin to Appear Pro Hac Vice $100.00 filing fee receipt number 32438 by Christina Lee Thomas (Attachments: #1 Certificates of Good Standing, #2 Cover Letter)(JEG) Modified on 6/23/2023 to add payment information. (EDC). |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Christina Lee Thomas identifying Affiliate/Interested Person Christina Lee Thomas, Affiliate/Interested Person Debra S. Shifrin for Christina Lee Thomas. (JEG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Christina Lee Thomas. $402.00 filing fee Receipt number 32438, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JEG) Modified on 6/23/2023 to add payment information. (EDC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
