Deville v. Capital Area Transit System
| Mr. William Deville and William Deville |
| Capital Area Transit System |
| 3:2023cv01594 |
| November 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Richard L Bourgeois |
| Brian A Jackson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Certificate of Interested Persons by Capital Area Transit System (Hains, Alexandra) (Main Document 15 replaced on 1/9/2024) (EDC). Modified on 1/9/2024 to flatten document. (EDC). |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY with LR 7.1 as to #13 Answer to Amended Complaint. Failure to file a Certificate of Interested Persons REQUIRED CORRECTION: Within one business day, the filer shall file a Certificate of Interested Persons and the interested persons shall be added to CM/ECF by the filer using the event Certificate of Interested Persons. (EDC) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Capital Area Transit System.(Hains, Alexandra) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Plead. Defendant Capital Area Transit System is granted an extension of time until 1/2/2024 to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 12/14/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (SGO)
|
| Filing 11 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint, by Capital Area Transit System (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading; Proposed Order)(Hains, Alexandra) |
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #11 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint, . This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (LLH) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint against Capital Area Transit System, filed by William Deville.(Muhammad, Michael) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: A Telephone Scheduling Conference is set for 3/7/2024 at 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr. Counsel for Plaintiff(s) shall initiate the call to all parties then contact the Court at (225) 389-3602. Status Report due by 2/22/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 12/8/2023. (SGO)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by William Deville re #1 Complaint, Mandi Sweeney, Sly Fox Investigations, SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Deville. All Defendants. (Barrow, Tammy) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Michael K. Muhammad to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff William Deville. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 12/6/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (SGO)ATTENTION: Local counsel shall provide the following link to those attorneys granted leave to proceed pro hac vice in the Middle District of Louisiana who choose to register for e-file access #www.lamd.uscourts.gov/pro-hac-vice-e-filing-registration.
|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #6 MOTION for Michael K. Muhammad to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2677796). This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (JEG) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Michael K. Muhammad to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2677796) by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Tammy Barrow Affidavit, #2 Attachment Texas Supreme Court Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Affidavit Michael K. Muhammad Affidavit, #4 Affidavit Oath - Michael K. Muhammad, #5 Attachment Consent To Electronic Filing)(Barrow, Tammy) Modified on 12/5/2023 to edit title of document. (JEG). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #3 Motion for Michael K. Muhammad to Appear Pro Hac Vice for failure to comply with Local Rule 83(b)(8)(C), which states: The applicant attorney shall state under oath whether any disciplinary proceedings or criminal charges have been instituted against the applicant, and if so, shall disclose full information about the proceeding or charges and the ultimate determination, if any. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 11/21/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (SGO)
|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #3 MOTION for Michael K. Muhammad to Appear Pro Hac Vice. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (JEG) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Capital Area Transit System. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (JEG) |
| Notice of Payment of $100.00 Pro Hac Vice Fee by William Deville. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ALAMDC-2670416. (Barrow, Tammy) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Michael K. Muhammad to Appear Pro Hac Vice by William Deville (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion, #2 Oath Required by Local Rule, #3 Texas Supreme Court Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Texas Bar Certificate of Good Standing, #5 Proposed Order)(Barrow, Tammy) Modified on 11/15/2023 to reflect correct event. (JEG). |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by William Deville (Barrow, Tammy) (Main Document 2 replaced on 11/16/2023 to flatten document) (JEG). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capital Area Transit System ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAMDC-2669309.), filed by William Deville. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Barrow, Tammy) (Attachment 2 replaced on 11/15/2023) (JEG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
