International Mezzo Technologies, Inc. v. Airborne ECS, LLC
| International Mezzo Technologies, Inc. |
| Airborne ECS, LLC |
| 3:2023cv01620 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Richard L Bourgeois |
| Brian A Jackson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: A Telephone Scheduling Conference is set for 3/14/2024 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr. Counsel for Plaintiff(s) shall initiate the call to all parties then contact the Court at (225) 389-3602. Status Report due by 2/29/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 12/7/2023. (SGO)
|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by International Mezzo Technologies, Inc.. Airborne ECS, LLC waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 1/30/2024. (Gummer, Emily) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE: Counsel shall submit the approved AO 120 for Patents and Trademarks form located at #https://www.uscourts.gov/forms/other-forms/report-filing-patenttrademark for transmission to the Patent and Trademark Office. Once completed, the form will be filed using the event Report on Filing of AO 120 - Patents or Trademarks located under the Notices Category. (DCB) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons by International Mezzo Technologies, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Thermo Holdco, LLC for International Mezzo Technologies, Inc.. (Scotton, David) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by International Mezzo Technologies, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Thermo Holdco, LLC for International Mezzo Technologies, Inc... (Scotton, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Airborne ECS, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAMDC-2673341.), filed by International Mezzo Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- 8/7/23 Notice, #2 Exhibit B- Indianapolis Motor Speedway Article, #3 Exhibit C- Advocate Article, #4 Exhibit D- DOE Press Release, #5 Exhibit E- American Nuclear Society Article, #6 Exhibit F- 48th International Conference on Environmental Systems Article, #7 Exhibit G- Mezzo Patent 8,177,932, #8 Exhibit H- Airborne Patent 11,519,670, #9 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(Scotton, David) (Attachments 7 & 8 replaced on 11/28/2023) (EDC). Modified on 11/28/2023 to rotate pages. (EDC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: International Mezzo Technologies, Inc. v. Airborne ECS, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: International Mezzo Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David Scotton |
| Represented By: | Emily Gummer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Airborne ECS, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
