Williams v. Entergy Services LLC et al
| Lakeshia Williams |
| Entergy Services LLC, Marlon Merritt, Robert Moore, Nicholas Winiewicz, Jr, Kya Moller, Melanie Fite, Jason Rees, Amy L. Amerson, Angela Stripling, Shayla Atkins, Trene Beasley, Allen East, Scott Becnel, Joshua Vance, Eric Vickers and Christopher Darden |
| 3:2023cv01645 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| John W deGravelles |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 12/29/2023. (JEG)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lakeshia Williams (NLT) |
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT) |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Pro Se (non-inmate) Flag (ELW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee paid receipt # 32767 $ 405.), filed by Lakeshia Williams. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Supportive Docs to complaint, #2 Attachment EEOC Documents)(ELW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
