Bennett v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
| ANTONIO BENNETT |
| Progressive Casualty Insurance Company |
| 3:2023cv01647 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| John W deGravelles |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
GENERAL ORDER: All pleadings and other papers filed under seal in civil and criminal actions shall be maintained under seal for thirty days following final disposition of the action. After that time, all sealed pleadings and other papers shall be placed in the case record unless a District Judge or Magistrate Judge, upon motion and for good cause shown, orders that the pleading or other paper be maintained under seal. The deadline for filing any motions regarding the unsealing of any document shall be within thirty days of the final disposition of any action and shall contain a concise statement of reasons for maintaining the pleading or other paper under seal. ATTENTION: If a motion to retain documents under seal is NOT filed, all documents shall be placed in the public case record, unless specifically identified in the attached General Order Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/8/2019. (LLH)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Unopposed Motion to Dismiss this matter without prejudice. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 12/21/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (KDC)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss without Prejudice by Antonio Bennett (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Spurling, Dennis) |
|
Filing 3
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 3/7/2024 at 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson. Status Report due by 2/22/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 12/12/2023. (KAH)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT UNDER UM POLIICY against Progressive Casualty Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAMDC-2679208.), filed by ANTONIO BENNETT. (Attachments: #1 CIVIL COVERSHEET, #2 summons)(Spurling, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bennett v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANTONIO BENNETT | |
| Represented By: | Dennis Damonn Spurling |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
