Breaux v. Commissioner of Social Security
Leonard Breaux |
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. O'Malley |
General Counsel Social Security Administration |
3:2024cv00033 |
January 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
John W deGravelles |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: This action for judicial review of the administrative decision shall proceed in accordance with the schedule stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 2/7/2024. (BLR) |
Filing 8 Notice of Service: Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), effective December 1, 2022, the Clerk of Court notified both the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Louisiana of the commencement of this action by transmission of a Notice of Electronic Filing. Accordingly, the plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. (LLH) |
Filing 7 ORDER: The plaintiff in this cause having tendered to the Court a complaint and affidavit with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (R. Doc. 2); IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk shall file said complaint without prepayment of costs or security thereof and the Clerk is directed to issue process to the defendant. The plaintiff is responsible for service of summons and complaint on the defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 1/25/2024. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons by Leonard Breaux identifying Affiliate/Interested Person Leonard Breaux, Affiliate/Interested Person Karl E. Osterhout, Affiliate/Interested Person Osterhout Berger Disability Law, Affiliate/Interested Person Martin J. O'Malley for Leonard Breaux. (Osterhout, Karl) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Karl Osterhout to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ATTENTION: Local counsel shall provide the following link to those attorneys granted leave to proceed pro hac vice in the Middle District of Louisiana who choose to register for e-file access #www.lamd.uscourts.gov/pro-hac-vice-e-filing-registration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 1/18/2024. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis , #3 MOTION for Karl Osterhout to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2697056). This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (EDC) |
Filing 4 There is no record document 4. Entered in error by the Case Administrator. (EDC) Modified on 1/23/2024 to edit the text. (EDC). |
Filing 3 MOTION for Karl Osterhout to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2697056) by Leonard Breaux (Attachments: #1 Affidavit PHV Affidavit, #2 Exhibit PHV Cert of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Pleading; PHV Proposed Order)(Venkataraman, Vijay) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leonard Breaux (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading; IFP Proposed Order)(Venkataraman, Vijay) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Leonard Breaux. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(Venkataraman, Vijay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.