Travis v. Ford Motor Company
| Monty Theodore Travis |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 3:2024cv00137 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Richard L Bourgeois |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company.(Maxwell, Robert) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion and Order for Extension of Time to Plead. Defendant Ford Motor Company is granted an extension of time until 4/22/2024 to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 3/18/2024. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (SGO)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monty Theodore Travis. Ford Motor Company served on 3/11/2024, answer due 4/1/2024. (Duck, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ford Motor Company identifying Corporate Parent Bank of America, Corporate Parent Wellington Management Company, LLP, Corporate Parent Bank of America National Association for Ford Motor Company.. (Maxwell, Robert) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time To file Answer by Ford Motor Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading; Proposed Order)(Maxwell, Robert) Modified on 3/18/2024 to edit event type (SGO). |
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time To file Answer. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (ELW) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: A Telephone Scheduling Conference is set for 5/16/2024 at 03:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr. Counsel for Plaintiff(s) shall initiate the call to all parties then contact the Court at (225) 389-3602. Status Report due by 5/2/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 2/28/2024. (SGO)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ford Motor Company. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Monty Theodore Travis (Duck, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Company ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAMDC-2716145.), filed by Monty Theodore Travis. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Summons)(Duck, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Travis v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Monty Theodore Travis | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Reeve Duck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Robert William Maxwell |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Genevay Lagarde |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
