Castle v. Starbucks Corporation

Plaintiff: Madison Castle
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 3:2024cv00193
Filed: March 7, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Richard L Bourgeois
Referring Judge: Brian A Jackson
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2024 Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Madison Castle, filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Starbucks SOS)(Farrington, Maryclaire) Modified on 4/10/2024 to edit text.(EDC).
April 8, 2024 Filing 8 ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1653, that, on or before April 22, 2024, the removing defendant shall file an amended notice of removal providing the citizenship of defendant Starbucks Corporation, by setting forth all citizenship particulars required to sustain federal diversity jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 4/8/2024. (EDC)
April 5, 2024 Filing 7 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: A Telephone Scheduling Conference is set for 6/13/2024 at 04:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr. Counsel for Plaintiff shall initiate the call to all parties then contact the Court at (225) 389-3602. Status Report due by 5/30/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 4/4/2024. (SGO)
March 13, 2024 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Starbucks Corporation.(Farrington, Maryclaire)
March 8, 2024 Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons by Starbucks Corporation (Farrington, Maryclaire)
March 8, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY with LR 7.1 as to #1 Notice of Removal. Failure to file a Certificate of Interested Persons REQUIRED CORRECTION: Within one business day, the filer shall file a Certificate of Interested Persons and the interested persons shall be added to CM/ECF by the filer using the event Certificate of Interested Persons. (EDC)
March 7, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Compliance by Starbucks Corporation to #1 Notice of Removal, (Webre, Rachel)
March 7, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Starbucks Corporation. (Webre, Rachel)
March 7, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 19th JDC for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, Case Number C-743591. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAMDC-2724315), filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - State Court Record, #2 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(Webre, Rachel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Castle v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Madison Castle
Represented By: Philip Donatien Lorio, IV
Represented By: Justin M. Chopin
Represented By: Patrick Weilbaecher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Rachel Guajardo Webre
Represented By: Maryclaire McNickle Farrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?