Joseph v. Roszczvnialsk et al
| Nathaniel Joseph |
| Nicholas Roszczvnialsk, Sanford Ron and Kathryn E. Jones |
| 3:2024cv00208 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Richard L Bourgeois |
| Brian A Jackson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Minute Entry/Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr.: Evidentiary Hearing held on 4/30/2024. Status of this matter was discussed. Attorney Samuel DAquilla made an appearance on behalf of defendant Nicholas Roszczvnialsk for this proceeding only. Plaintiff presented documents to the Court for review. These documents were returned to the Plaintiff and he will take them to the Clerk's office for filing. This matter was taken under advisement and an Order would be issued at a later date. (EDC) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Pro Se E-Service and E-Notice Consent Form by Nathaniel Joseph (NLT) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Additional Evidence by Nathaniel Joseph (NLT) |
|
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kathryn E. Jones, Sanford Ron, Nicholas Roszczvnialsk (Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number 32943), filed by Nathaniel Joseph. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)(EDC) Modified on 3/15/2024 to add payment information. (EDC). |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Pro Se (non-inmate) Flag (EDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.