Brown et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
| Jesse Brown and Anglyn Brown |
| State Farm Fire and Casualty Company |
| 3:2024cv00315 |
| April 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Richard L Bourgeois |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Considering that no party has indicated that they are withholding their Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge, this case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment pursuant to General Order 2024-02. (DCB) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER and Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.(Eversberg, Andrew) Modified on 5/8/2024 to edit title of document. (JEG). |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 8/1/2024 at 01:30 PM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. Status Report due by 7/18/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 4/30/2024. (BLR)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: As previously noticed, this case has been assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment and direct review by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. See General Order 2024-02 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. Consent to a Magistrate Judge is voluntary. Any party may decline consent by indicating such on the attached form and emailing, faxing, or mailing the form back to the court as stated herein. The form must be received no later than 14 days from the filing of this notice. DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS FORM. If a party does not return the form by the designated deadline, that party is deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. If any party declines consent, then a district judge will be randomly assigned to the matter. (DCB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: This case has been assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment, and direct review by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. See General Order 2024-02 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. Consent to a Magistrate Judge is voluntary. Any party may decline consent. Once all parties have appeared in this matter, a Consent Form will be noticed to the parties and a deadline set for the form to be returned to the court. The form will not be part of the court record and the identity of any party declining consent will not be communicated to any judge. (DCB) |
| Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. no longer assigned to the case. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (NLT) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company identifying Corporate Parent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (Eversberg, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 18th Judicial District Court, West Baton Rouge Parish, Case Number 1048965. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAMDC-2742645), filed by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record)(Eversberg, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
