Brooks v. Menifee et al
Love Altonio Brooks |
Fredrick Menifee, Kenneth Montgomery and S Airington |
1:2007cv00131 |
January 19, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office |
Grant |
Dee D Drell |
James D Kirk |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 135 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 129 Motion to Vacate. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 4/14/15. (crt,Roaix, G) |
Filing 116 MEMORANDUM RULING re 97 Bench Trial. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 09/25/13. (crt,Guillot, M) |
Filing 74 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 65 Report and Recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment on the issue of timeliness is DENIED. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 10/26/11. (crt,Roaix, G) |
Filing 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 31 MOTION to Dismiss/Summary Judgment RECOMMENDING that both motions for summary judgment be DENIED on the Eighth Amendment issue as to the second hand smoke. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDE D that Brooks' motion for summary 37 judgment be GRANTED and defendants' motion for summary judgment 31 be DENIED on the retaliation claims against Airington. Objections to R&R due by 10/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge James D Kirk on 09/25/09. (crt,Burge, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.