Lavalais v. Boise Cascade L L C
Plaintiff: Marlon Lavalais
Defendant: Boise Cascade L L C
Case Number: 1:2009cv00405
Filed: March 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Rapides
Presiding Judge: Dee D Drell
Presiding Judge: James D Kirk
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 4 MOTION to Remand RECOMMENDING that Lavalais' motion be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge James D Kirk on 08/14/09. (crt,Burge, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lavalais v. Boise Cascade L L C
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlon Lavalais
Represented By: Donna Unkel Grodner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boise Cascade L L C
Represented By: Keith M Pyburn, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?